Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
03/27/04 10:26
Read: times


 
#67491 - RE: OVERLAYABLE
Responding to: ???'s previous message
Eric,
the assembler directives are not the problem.

The problem is that the linker still does not overlay segments which are declared as overlayable. Probably because it doesn't know the dependencies between the modules, and which segment may be overlayed with which other segment.
There are linker controls for this, but they are only poorly described in the linker manual, and the examples given there are not accepted or don't work.


List of 13 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
Multiple usage of (i.e.) xdata space?            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: Multiple usage of (i.e.) xdata space?            01/01/70 00:00      
      OVERLAYABLE            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: OVERLAYABLE            01/01/70 00:00      
            RE: OVERLAYABLE            01/01/70 00:00      
               RE: OVERLAYABLE            01/01/70 00:00      
                  RE: OVERLAYABLE            01/01/70 00:00      
                     RE: OVERLAYABLE            01/01/70 00:00      
                        RE: OVERLAYABLE, a dirty trick            01/01/70 00:00      
                           RE: OVERLAYABLE, a dirty trick            01/01/70 00:00      
                              RE: OVERLAYABLE, a dirty trick            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: Multiple usage of (i.e.) xdata space            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: Multiple usage of (i.e.) xdata space?            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List