??? 03/27/04 10:26 Read: times |
#67491 - RE: OVERLAYABLE Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Eric,
the assembler directives are not the problem. The problem is that the linker still does not overlay segments which are declared as overlayable. Probably because it doesn't know the dependencies between the modules, and which segment may be overlayed with which other segment. There are linker controls for this, but they are only poorly described in the linker manual, and the examples given there are not accepted or don't work. |
Topic | Author | Date |
Multiple usage of (i.e.) xdata space? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Multiple usage of (i.e.) xdata space? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
OVERLAYABLE | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: OVERLAYABLE | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: OVERLAYABLE | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: OVERLAYABLE | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: OVERLAYABLE | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: OVERLAYABLE | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: OVERLAYABLE, a dirty trick | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: OVERLAYABLE, a dirty trick | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: OVERLAYABLE, a dirty trick![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Multiple usage of (i.e.) xdata space | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Multiple usage of (i.e.) xdata space? | 01/01/70 00:00 |