??? 04/15/04 13:05 Read: times |
#68530 - RE: STARTUP.A51 Responding to: ???'s previous message |
My bad.
The code is exactly what is provided by Keil and works fine. I had erroneously assumed that Raj had modified the code and therefore had made a mistake. In this case the mistake was mine, sorry Raj. |
Topic | Author | Date |
Assembly works but C... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Assembly works but C... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Assembly works but C... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Assembly works but C... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Assembly works but C... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Assembly works but C... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Assembly works but C... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Assembly works but C... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
STARTUP.A51 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: STARTUP.A51 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: STARTUP.A51 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Stand Still... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Stand Still... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: STARTUP.A51 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: STARTUP.A51 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
function for LCD in C... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: function for LCD in C...![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Assembly works but C... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Assembly works but C... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Assembly works but C... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Assembly works but C... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Assembly works but C... | 01/01/70 00:00 |