| ??? 04/19/04 13:58 Read: times |
#68775 - RE: Wot - No Manuals?! Responding to: ???'s previous message |
erik malund said:
create a skeleton function in C for your assembly subroutine. Then use the generated assembles as a template for your subroutine. And vice-versa, look at the Compiler's generated assembler to see how it does its calls. These show you what the compiler does; by reading the Manuals, you will learn to understand why it does it! |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| calling a C function in asm, vise versa | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: calling a C function in asm, vise versa | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: calling a C function in asm, vise versa | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Manuals | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: calling a C function in asm, vise versa | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: calling a C function in asm, vise versa | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Calling functions - not inline assembler | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Calling functions - not inline assembler | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Calling functions - not inline assembler | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Wot - No Manuals?! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Wot - No Manuals?! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Wot - No Manuals?! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Wot - No Manuals?! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Wot - No Manuals?! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Negative logic?! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Negative logic?! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| - a case for naked functions? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| - a case for naked functions? | 01/01/70 00:00 |