| ??? 04/27/04 20:55 Read: times |
#69344 - RE: Atmel - Why??!! Responding to: ???'s previous message |
But what was the point?
Is it actually any clearer for being in 'C' than in assembler? And there are so many compiler dependencies (eg, use of 'small'; endian-ness of DPTR and Uint16) that the chances of it being truly general and portable must be vanishingly small! |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| how to access DPTR using Ride c | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: how to access DPTR using Ride c | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| DO NOT access DPTR using C ! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: how to access DPTR using Ride c | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RTFM! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: how to access DPTR using Ride c | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Hack!? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Hack!? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Hack!? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Just ignore me - Im talking rubbish! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Hello ALL THANK YOU | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Hack!? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Oops, many people - many suggestions | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Hack!?Oleg | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Hack!?Oleg | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: THE LESSON OF IT ALL!!!!!!!! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: THE LESSON OF IT ALL!!!!!!!! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: THE LESSON OF IT ALL!!!!!!!! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Atmel - Why??!! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| THANK YOU ALL | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: THANK YOU ALL | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: THANK YOU ALL | 01/01/70 00:00 |