??? 05/03/04 21:18 Read: times |
#69790 - RE: AD7730 Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Hi Behnam,
With all the magic numbers and no comments in the code, you had better hope you never have to touch the code again...it will be unmaintainable. Sometimes going back through the code to document what those numbers are, you are forced to double-check them and you might find something that's initialized incorrectly. Dennis |
Topic | Author | Date |
AD7730 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: AD7730 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: AD7730 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: AD7730 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: AD7730 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: AD7730 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: AD7730 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: AD7730 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: AD7730 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: AD7730 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: AD7730 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: AD7730 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: AD7730 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: AD7730 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: AD7730![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 |