| ??? 05/27/04 08:46 Read: times |
#71320 - Wrong approach. Responding to: ???'s previous message |
sameer s said:
impliment rotate thru carry instruction in C language Why do you want to do that? The whole point of writing in a high-level language (eg, 'C') is to avoid needing to think of the details of specific CPU registers, instructions, etc - you should be concentrating on what you want to achieve, rather than how the CPU will implement it. So, what is it that you are actually trying to achieve? |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Rotate thru carry in C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Rotate thru carry in C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Rotate thru carry in C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Rotate thru carry in C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Rotate thru carry in C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Rotate thru carry in C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| DO *NOT* DO THIS! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: DO *NOT* DO THIS! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Rotate thru carry in C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Rotate thru carry in C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Wrong approach. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: so often | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Also on the Keil forum | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Link trouble again | 01/01/70 00:00 |