??? 06/22/04 15:58 Read: times |
#72957 - RE: Disassembly 80c552 - can anyone help? Responding to: ???'s previous message |
I would suggest that anything "thermal" is likely to have such a slow response time, because of the inertia of the system, that you don“t need to use high speed, handcrafted assembler code to get the performance you need. In my systems, I have moved the thermal servos to external loops handled by PC code rather than in the 8052 systems - sample rates are around 1 second.
Steve |
Topic | Author | Date |
Disassembly 80c552 - can anyone help? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Disassembly 80c552 - can anyone help? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Disassembly 80c552 - can anyone help? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Disassembly 80c552 - can anyone help? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Disassembly 80c552 - can anyone help? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Disassembly 80c552 - can anyone help? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Gimme Code?! ;-) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Disassembly 80c552 - can anyone help? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Disassembly 80c552 - can anyone help | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Disassembly 80c552 - can anyone help | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Disassembly 80c552 - can anyone help | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Disassembly 80c552 - can anyone help | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Disassembly 80c552 - can anyone help | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Disassembly 80c552 - can anyone help | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
a thought re the above | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Disassembly 80c552 - can anyone help | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
The Crunch | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: The Crunch![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 |