| ??? 07/17/04 09:37 Read: times Msg Score: 0 -1 Offensive/Flame +1 Underrated |
#74380 - No Problem! Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Raj Shetgar said:
the problem is that "minimum CLK pulse width within 200 nS" (sic) Note that the symbol for seconds is a lowercase 's' - see http://www.8052.com/forum/read.phtml?id=69191 The minimum pulse width defines the maximum frequency. Raj Shetgar said:
I am not sure if any 8051(low cost) is capable of doing this high speed So there's no problem then, is there? If it can't even reach the maximum frequency (minimum pulse width), you have no worries about exceeding it! |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| high speed clock... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: high speed clock... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: high speed clock... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: high speed clock... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
No Problem! | 01/01/70 00:00 |