??? 07/23/04 12:17 Read: times |
#74744 - RE: I2C EEPROM on 668 Responding to: ???'s previous message |
All I can say, without spending a lot of time, is that I have used the codearchitect code on a Cygnal and thus what is wrong must be in the things that are different between the 668 and the 932. Check your clocking code. I did it on a 668 as well, but that code was lost when our, new that now is former, IT person decided to reconfigure our servers.
If that code had been promoted to a production unit it would not have been lost, but we decided to change tothe f126. Erik |
Topic | Author | Date |
I2C EEPROM on 668 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: I2C EEPROM on 668 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: I2C EEPROM on 668 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: I2C EEPROM on 668 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: I2C EEPROM on 668 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: I2C EEPROM on 668 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: I2C EEPROM on 668 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: I2C EEPROM on 668 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: I2C EEPROM on 668 - thanks![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 |