| ??? 07/23/04 23:06 Read: times |
#74772 - RE: undefined behaviour land Responding to: ???'s previous message |
I said:
In this case, note that the "%s" is superfluous... Donald Catto said:
Well, not quite. If the source string contains a '%' you will find yourself in undefined behaviour land. Yes, that is a very good & entirely valid point that I had overlooked. Anyway, now it's all been clearly explained by Donald & Michael, I'm sure this thread will be referred to in future...! |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| doub about strutc pointers | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: doub about strutc pointers | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: doub about strutc pointers | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| What do you doubt? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: What do you doubt? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: What do you doubt? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: What do you doubt? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: What do you doubt? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: What do you doubt? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: What do you doubt? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: What do you doubt? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: undefined behaviour land | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: What do you doubt? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Still unknown doubt | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: doub about strutc pointers | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Nothing 8051-specific here | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Nothing 8051-specific here | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: doub about strutc pointers | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: doub about strutc pointers | 01/01/70 00:00 |