| ??? 08/27/04 16:01 Read: times |
#76507 - RE: AT89C51Rx2 ISP - Bootloader address Responding to: ???'s previous message |
"I also tried the AT89C51ED2 and AT89C51RB2 and both worked as described." As described where, exactly? The datasheet for the RD2 and ED2 is the same and has a quite astonishing 'errors per page' count, particularly in the areas that describe the bootloader and API calls. They worked as I described. I don't think any Atmel parts work as they describe ;-) -- Tom Bachmann |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| AT89C51Rx2 ISP - No Touch | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: AT89C51Rx2 ISP - No Touch | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: BLJB | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: BLJB | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: AT89C51Rx2 ISP - No Touch | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: AT89C51Rx2 ISP - No Touch | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: AT89C51Rx2 ISP - No Touch | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: AT89C51Rx2 ISP - No Touch | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: AT89C51Rx2 ISP - No Touch working! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: AT89C51Rx2 ISP - No Touch working! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: AT89C51Rx2 ISP - Bootloader address | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: AT89C51Rx2 ISP - Bootloader address | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: AT89C51Rx2 ISP - Bootloader address | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: AT89C51Rx2 ISP - Bootloader address | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: AT89C51Rx2 ISP - Bootloader address | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: AT89C51Rx2 ISP - Bootloader address | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: AT89C51Rx2 ISP - Bootloader address | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: AT89C51Rx2 ISP - No Touch working! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: AT89C51Rx2 ISP - No Touch backdoor | 01/01/70 00:00 |