??? 11/03/04 12:09 Read: times |
#80304 - RE: It worked for me Responding to: ???'s previous message |
What I find is that if the /L argument isn't supplied, it ignores the /P argument, and if the /L argument is used without /P, 0xFF is used as the pad value instead of 0x00. |
Topic | Author | Date |
Hex2Bin Pad Data Command Line Argument | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Hex2Bin Pad Data Command Line Argument | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Hex2Bin Pad Data Command Line Argument | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Hex2Bin Pad Data Command Line Argument | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Hex2Bin Pad Data Command Line Argument | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Hex2Bin Pad Data Command Line Argument | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Hex2Bin Pad Data Command Line Argument | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Hex2Bin Pad Data Command Line Argument | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
It worked for me | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: It worked for me | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: It worked for me![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Answer is wrong - gaps in Hex files | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Answer is wrong - gaps in Hex files | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
More info | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Hex2Bin Pad Data Command Line Argument | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: alternatives to Keil Hex2Bin | 01/01/70 00:00 |