??? 11/09/04 14:14 Read: times |
#80787 - RE: another suggestion Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Thanks Erik. I am aware of the LPC9xx possibilities. I was trying to be in a mode of keeping the design of my distributed PWM functions as simple as possible without incurring additional oscillators, reset circuits etc etc.
I guess if I was going to look at the LPC9xx parts I could just as well look at the Cygnal 'F3xx parts. THey would work well too. Michael Karas |
Topic | Author | Date |
I2C PWM TImer Chip Available? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: I2C PWM TImer Chip Available? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: I2C PWM TImer Chip Available? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: I2C PWM TImer Chip Available? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
another suggestion | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: another suggestion | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: another suggestion | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: I2C PWM TImer Chip Available? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: I2C PWM TImer Chip Available? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: I2C PWM TImer Chip Available? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: I2C PWM TImer Chip Available? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: I2C PWM TImer Chip Available? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: I2C PWM TImer Chip Available? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: I2C PWM TImer Chip Available? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: I2C PWM TImer Chip Available?![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 |