| ??? 11/19/04 14:54 Read: times |
#81512 - Assembly code no better than keil Responding to: ???'s previous message |
When it comes to the things you say are done in the ISR, there should be no real difference between the code generated by the C compiler and what you can write in assembler. Unless, the C code is poorly designed or poorly implemented.
I put the #pragma SRC directive in my c source file to get the compiler generated assembly. It seems to be very efficient assembly code and is exactly the same as what I had written manually. You guys are absolutely right there seems to be no advantage of using assembly for this application. Thanks & Regards, Prahlad Purohit |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Interrupt Function Prototype & Keil | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Re: Interrupt Function Prototype & Keil | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No Parameters | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| ASM vs 'C' | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Interrupt Routines | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Assembly code no better than keil | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| efficient C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Hardware IIC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I2C(C) = I2C(asm) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| C-asm delay | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
OSC_FREQ | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| no need for prototypes! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Same | 01/01/70 00:00 |