| ??? 11/24/04 11:06 Read: times |
#81827 - Inefficient! Responding to: ???'s previous message |
not only do you have a superfluous loop counter, but it's also an int!
You don't need a counter for that loop - you don't use it for anything! See the code in K&R for example. This really does beg the question of why you're trying to write your own strcpy - clearly not for reasons of efficiency! |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| strcpy - inrinsic? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| C231 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| c231 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Maybe not strcpy? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| strcpy | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Finding Keil error descriptions | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| odd | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| additional info: source code | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| additional info | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Your code | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Thanks | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Inefficient! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Inefficient! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| One thing to note | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I just can't resist it | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
One common reason why. | 01/01/70 00:00 |