??? 12/06/04 11:28 Read: times |
#82594 - Sounds like assembler....... Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Sounds like the solution is to write some math routines in assembler to cope with the extended range. One way would be to declare a type for your extended range. This type would amount to an array of 6 bytes (assuming 48bits). You would then pass pointers to these arrays to your assembler routines. Best hope that you're not doing anything more than +,-,*,/ !!!
Do a search on 32bit math routines and extend the code to cope with 48 bits. Should be educational! Be sure to test thoroughly! |
Topic | Author | Date |
Storage type more than Unsigned long int | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Back to Assembly | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
9998990001000 = 48bit | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
re-scale | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
What language? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
What Language | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Sounds like assembler....... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
re-scale | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
a common case![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 |