| ??? 12/06/04 13:59 Read: times |
#82602 - Andy, I tried it Responding to: ???'s previous message |
I've not tried this, but I wonder if putting the shared function (and the shared function alone) into a file that is #inlcuded with the ISR and main would help?
It works beautifully, I have used it; however I did long ago choose using macro instead as a standard procedure. Using macro, rather than #include allow you to have macro parametres which gives you the opportunity to have a few variables or whatever that differ in the 2 cases. Erik |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| 89s52 function sharing. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Try This | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| emphasis | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| an idea... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Andy, I tried it | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Jolly good! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Error | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| You need to work on it | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| reentrant ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| reentrant | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| non-reentrant | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Wow | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| varaible sharing? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Variable sharing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Overflow | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| variables, main and ISR | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Globals use more memory | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Isn't that a global? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Globals, ISRs, main, & static | 01/01/70 00:00 |