| ??? 12/31/04 09:27 Read: times |
#84160 - Agreed Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Andy Neil said:
The scope (ie, whether they're local or not) has nothing to do with it - it's size that matters here! Agreed! I could have made that a bit clearer. In this case the problem was some local variables that were larger than neccessary. In the general case don't make any variables longer than they need to be. Paul |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| C Code t o Assembly | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| C to Asm | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| C Code t o Assembly | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| only one table | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Need some more details | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not even true ! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Answer is Wrong!! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Re : previous 3 replies and Paul | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Previously on 8052.com | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Overflow | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| just one array | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| too limited, Paul | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Nothing to do with scope | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Agreed | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No success ! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Re: Peter | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| to assembly | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Example code | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Any unused functions in your program? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| query | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Off-Topic - start a new thread | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
... and use a _descriptive_ subject! | 01/01/70 00:00 |