??? 01/26/05 13:23 Read: times |
#85798 - Does this term have any general meaning? Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Hatem Zakaria said:
Pure Code (Codes which dosn't modify itself.) Where did you get that definition? Is this actually an accepted term in some context? There seem to be plenty of other usages; eg, http://www.it-faq.pl/mskb/45/950.HTM http://www.pubuwebteam.com/faq.html (4th bullet point) Neither of which has any relevance to the 8051! |
Topic | Author | Date |
Pure Code | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Pure Code | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Pure Code | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Impure code? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Pure Code | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
do not use the wrong processor | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Awash with Pure Code examples! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Does this term have any general meaning? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Does this term have any general meaning? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
OK, so what is your question? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
My question | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
all code is pure ! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
To put it the opposite way,... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Mel![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
applications in which we can use this | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
applications in which we can use this | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Pure Logic | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Not "Pure Code", Pure code | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
no local variables | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Some did in the past | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Nothing Special | 01/01/70 00:00 |