Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
01/28/05 07:12
Read: times


 
#85992 - Thanks Peter
Responding to: ???'s previous message
Thanks Peter I will try that code
Charles i am using metalink asm51 assembler and it does not give error any way that part of code is of no use as it is simple delay.
i have now made program using polling posted at
http://www.8052.com/users/gop8051/gopal.asm
but again it is giving wrong result.
the result as i get on hyperterminal is given below the code
which gives igh period and low period of wave form in hex code

I checked with an oscilloscope.This is result i got
Period of wave 300us
high period 130 us
low period 170us
Duty cycle=0.32-0.0047*temp
using this value i cal temp and was correct at 25 degree celcius

so i am pretty sure i am doing some mistake in intialisation of timers.Pls can somebody point out the mistake


List of 30 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
help with duty cycle measurement            01/01/70 00:00      
   woefully incomplete            01/01/70 00:00      
      Definitions            01/01/70 00:00      
         gobbelygook            01/01/70 00:00      
   Routines            01/01/70 00:00      
   sorry for the gobbelygook            01/01/70 00:00      
      A job for the PCA?            01/01/70 00:00      
      now that is clear            01/01/70 00:00      
      4 errors found in your smt_1.asm pgm            01/01/70 00:00      
         maybe only 3            01/01/70 00:00      
   cannot change            01/01/70 00:00      
   SMT160 example code in C            01/01/70 00:00      
      why            01/01/70 00:00      
         It is absolute necessary !            01/01/70 00:00      
            on the fly            01/01/70 00:00      
               Thus I use assembler !            01/01/70 00:00      
                  not assembler but int            01/01/70 00:00      
                     It must be XCH !            01/01/70 00:00      
                        still wrong to read with running            01/01/70 00:00      
                           not wrong, since it is tested !            01/01/70 00:00      
                              OK            01/01/70 00:00      
            Thanks to all            01/01/70 00:00      
   Thanks Peter            01/01/70 00:00      
      Do some simple tests first            01/01/70 00:00      
         Problem solved But            01/01/70 00:00      
   Modified code and mistakes            01/01/70 00:00      
   smt160.asm example            01/01/70 00:00      
      Thanks for example            01/01/70 00:00      
   Please explain            01/01/70 00:00      
      Yes            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List