| ??? 03/14/05 14:52 Read: times |
#89637 - why so emotional? Responding to: ???'s previous message |
hi,
Michael Karas said:
This IS useful information........It is VERY unreasonable to expect that Anil Gupta would have to do a search to find Oleg's like information buried inside an older thread if he did not know it was there!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Michael, first of all, the one of forum features moves last posts to the top of list so anybody is able to make quick look on what has been posted. Secondly, there were two posts about this news and a little discussion about the subject as well. Thirdly, as we have been said, the news should be posted into News. In four, what is wrong if someone does search before post anything? In my opinion, this is right way and recommended way for all members. When you press "Start New Thread" then there are five suggestions including: Before starting a new subject or posting your question... ... 2. Is there a recent existing thread on the topic? If so, please post your message as a reply to that thread rather than creating a new thread. 5. Have you searched the message forum? Summarize, I think that it is VERY reasonable to expect that anybody would have to do a search before posting. Michael Karas said:
Erik: Your crazy -1 vote is utter nonsense.........If you think it is reasonable to vote -1 then the whole forum should start voting -1 EVERY time you post your "cut and paste" repetition about going to the links section reading the bible. Damn......many times you post your cut and paste bible links even when other posters have already said to look into the bible links. (If you need me to find some examples I can point them out to you!!!). Michael, why so much emotion? I remember your -1 for Andy. Now I see these big bold words from you. That`s not good way. I just asked Anil Gupta - it seems this was my mistake. I am sorry, I beg his pardon, and I am sorry, Erik, that my post gives you negative. And excuse me, Michael, for that comes to nervious posts. Gives me all these minuses and relax. Michael Karas said:
PS....I voted +1 to cancel out your non-sense...I hope others vote +1 too. I voted +1 but to Erik post. This is because I cannot vote minuses for mine. Regards, Oleg |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| ATMEL New Fast 8051 core Micros | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| better than Philips 89LPC? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| ATMEL New Fast 8051 Micro - Flash 2-64K | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| why the new thread? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| why the same as a previous post | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not Useful.?.....Boggs to You | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| repeats | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| another note | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| So God..... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| You certainly think it is OK !!! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| why so emotional? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I point out my case...... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| good point | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Total agree! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Thank you, its useful ! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| But surely that's what NEWS is for?! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Why I started New Post | 01/01/70 00:00 |