??? 04/17/05 16:19 Read: times |
#91779 - No Responding to: ???'s previous message |
No, my meaning was, was the schematic supposed to show, in a way, the advantage of the PCB layout, where there would be no crosses on either side, but shown via your demo schematic.
I don't know about you, but we never permit a join drawn like your second example. In fact, I once successfully argued my way into a different class of marks in an EE exam because of that ! Steve |
Topic | Author | Date |
SPST switch | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Just a single switch ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Yes, but... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
No worries | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Clear now. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Keypad | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Realisation | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
For what it's worth | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
symbol | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
My take is a repeat | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I see what you mean but. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
You are missing something... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
No | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I gave a schematic not PCB layout | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
clarification![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Inside the ITT Tact Switch | 01/01/70 00:00 |