| ??? 05/07/05 14:08 Read: times |
#93169 - clarifications needed... Responding to: ???'s previous message |
mehdi,
your requirements are obscure... what enhancement you need? - enhance your code ? - guarantee your time constraints ? - all of above ? your taske duration is incremental all the time or just T, 2T. from your request and picture I can't figure if the cycle is: T(task) T(wait) 2T(task) 2T(wait) T(task) T(wait) 2T(task) 2T(wait) or something like: T(task) T(wait) 2T(task) 2T(wait) 3T(task) 3T(wait) 4T(task) 4T(wait)... if it is the first option you can loop it like LOOP: call code call delay call code call code call delay call delay goto loop very doable with the 443 bytes spared... can be asapted for a incrementall all the time scenario using variables to control the task and delay increments... hth orlando |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Need to an Enhanced Algorithm! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| clarifications needed... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Thanks Jose! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| microcontroller resources usage | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Re:microcontroller resources usage | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| ISP | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Re:ISP | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Cheap Vs Costly | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| a lesson learned | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not only for reading | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Excuse me! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not me | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Thanks | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| How Long ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
it is not complete, | 01/01/70 00:00 |