| ??? 02/20/01 13:54 Read: times |
#9490 - RE: Measuring frequency and phase angle |
For your stated frequency, you would be better timing edges than counting them for a fixed period, since you would have to wait too long to get enough cycles to count.
Steve |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Measuring frequency and phase angle | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Measuring frequency and phase angle | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Measuring frequency and phase angle | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Measuring frequency and phase angle | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Measuring frequency and phase angle | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Measuring frequency and phase angle | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Measuring frequency and phase angle | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Measuring frequency and phase angle | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Measuring frequency and phase angle | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Measuring frequency and phase angle | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Measuring frequency and phase angle | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Measuring frequency and phase angle | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Measuring frequency and phase angle | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Measuring frequency and phase angle | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Measuring frequency and phase angle | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Measuring frequency and phase angle | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE:measure time with interrupt | 01/01/70 00:00 |