Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
06/20/05 09:45
Read: times


 
Msg Score: +1
 +1 Good Answer/Helpful
#95329 - Superman
Responding to: ???'s previous message
"do you think one can do such a silly mistake"

Yes. There is a really silly, simple mistake in your code that is preventing it from doing anything remotely resembling what you expect it to do.

There is also a fundamental design flaw which, even if you manage to spot the really silly mistake, will prevent it from doing what you actually want it to do.

However, as you are clearly too clever to make silly mistakes I'll conclude that your ego is too fragile to have these mistakes explained to you.

List of 15 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
interrupt problem            01/01/70 00:00      
   The code doesn't seem to do much            01/01/70 00:00      
   Reti?            01/01/70 00:00      
      are you ok            01/01/70 00:00      
         RETI & CALL            01/01/70 00:00      
            The CPU performs an implicit call            01/01/70 00:00      
               SORRY! i was wrong.            01/01/70 00:00      
                  No loop or no jump around isr_timer1            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Is it need to set P3.2 if v use ext,intr            01/01/70 00:00      
                        read all about it            01/01/70 00:00      
   No "main loop"            01/01/70 00:00      
   re:code            01/01/70 00:00      
      re: code            01/01/70 00:00      
         Yes, and what have we gained?            01/01/70 00:00      
         Superman            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List