| ??? 06/23/05 07:54 Read: times |
#95682 - Macro vs Call Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Abhishek Singh said:
Macros are efficient in terms of speed as no extra processor cycles will be required to invoke the 'sequence' as the whole instruction sequence is inline Absolutely. The downside should now be obvious: Macros are "inefficient" in terms of Code Size as the whole instruction sequence is repeated inline every single time it is used. For a delay loop, there is probably no advantage to using a macro - the overhead of the call & return can simply be taken into account when calculating the number of loop iterations required. (a delay of just a few NOPs would be different...) |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| How to use marco in assembly? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| first you must spell it macro :) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| first you must spell it macro :) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not So Fast! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Macro Correction | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| improvement | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| to be more precise | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Delay | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I did not say... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Macros Defined | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Macro vs Call | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Macro Correction | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Polo! | 01/01/70 00:00 |