??? 06/29/05 13:04 Read: times |
#96183 - re: Alternatively... Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Thanks Donald for your inputs.
>>Keil is correct to give the 'bad operand' error. Having read >>the rest of this thread do you now understand why? That's why I wrote the following in my previous post "...I am aware of the logic behind Keil's handling of the issue. I am not disputing whether it is correct or wrong. My focus of the query is not that...." regards, |