??? 07/04/05 04:48 Read: times |
#96491 - format issue Responding to: ???'s previous message |
There may have been some improvements in the GIF since I last tried it for this sort of thing, but I doubt it, since it's a "standard" format. I've found GIF quite satisfactory for multicolored low-detail, low precision graphics, but for monochrome, specifically line-art rendering, I find it somewhat lacking, in that it tends to show breaks in lines where there should be none, among other failings.
With PDF, the problem is that, once rendered, a drawing is pretty hard to render in a readable size if it's been reduced. PCX and BMP's, of course, are enormous. The real issue, however, is to have a common component library as a resource so each contributor doesn't have to reinvent each component symbol. One thing that might be useful, if it were freely avaiable, would be a PCL-to-bmp (or other truly standard graphic format) utility. That way one could print-to-file using an HP PCL-compatible monochrome printer and use that as the transport medium from whatever format is used by his/her local schematic tool set and submit it as PCL. Another person could then translate the PCL to whatever graphic format he/she can conveniently view. That would allow everyone to use whatever schematic capture package is of his/her liking while still making it accessible to others. Surely there are other ways of dealing with this conundrum as well, probably better ones. RE |
Topic | Author | Date |
design library | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
WIKI !! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
do you think i qualified enough? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Schematic library | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Yes, but in what format? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Format issue | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
format issue | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
PNG | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
01/01/70 00:00 | ||
01/01/70 00:00 | ||
Another PDF![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 |