??? 07/11/05 20:43 Read: times |
#97088 - reentrant functions in sdcc |
Is it me or does sdcc behave in a very odd fasion when its working with variable storage in reentrant functions?
Ive read the manual as as far as I understand it in re-entrant functions automatic and static variables are placed on the stack in the upper 128 bytes of internal ram rather than the normal action of placing them in the lower 128 bytes of internal ram.So why doesnt sdcc use the indirect ram for static varibles in non-rentrant functions as it seems that would be the sensible thing to do.Theres prolly some ver good reason why it doesnt do that which someone will now point out to me. |
Topic | Author | Date |
reentrant functions in sdcc | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Eh??? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
ooops | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
what i mean is... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Who knows | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I should know | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
sounds like a good reason | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Thanks | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
stack-auto![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Thanks Craig | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
although.... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
WIP | 01/01/70 00:00 |