| ??? 08/17/05 16:06 Read: times |
#99573 - what was the problem? Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Tp Ow said:
Anyway, just to update on the status of the IAP. It is finally working, incrementing address writing and decrementing address writing. What was the problem? Jan Waclawek PS. There are as many erases as many calls to IAP #9 so if you call it 128 times within a block with A=1 each time, there are 128 (hidden) erases; if you call it once with A=128, there is one erase. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Strange problem IAP for whole chip | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Questions please | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Nobody knows? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| why | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| For IAP? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Which is exactly what FlashMagic is inte | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| and now we know why | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Get a PC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Enclose PCB in a box | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I understand | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Process make sense | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Thank god for the response | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Maybe the libraries in causing it ??? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| the problem with absolutes | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| AT89C51RC2 with 128 bytes per page | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| there is no such thing as a byte write, | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| byte write | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No byte write | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| what was the problem? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Problem was ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| OK, now face problems in Variables | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| variables used in my remote update | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Ok, Solved | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Try this | 01/01/70 00:00 |