Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
08/21/05 18:52
Read: times


 
#99786 - Back to basics
Responding to: ???'s previous message
Hi Dan, I must curse myself for having missed such a basic point. Previously, I had those buffers but once the project grew up, in the name of 'manual optimisation', I removed them to get back some data memory space.

The pointers are now working correctly. Thank you so much.

Cheers,
Vignesh.

List of 18 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
Keil C51-optimization & Pointers            01/01/70 00:00      
   Bad array index            01/01/70 00:00      
      oops!!            01/01/70 00:00      
         buff[] is auto, not static            01/01/70 00:00      
            Back to basics            01/01/70 00:00      
               Don't shoot the pianist!            01/01/70 00:00      
   Hex file size            01/01/70 00:00      
      Optimization pointers            01/01/70 00:00      
         sprintf() is fairly large            01/01/70 00:00      
         So start a new thread, then!            01/01/70 00:00      
         pls...help            01/01/70 00:00      
            I disagree            01/01/70 00:00      
      My dear Watson !            01/01/70 00:00      
         One size fits all            01/01/70 00:00      
   bin = hex / 2.8            01/01/70 00:00      
      hexmap            01/01/70 00:00      
      A bit of a sweeping generalisation!!            01/01/70 00:00      
   Keil C51-optimization & Pointers            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List