| ??? 06/09/06 19:58 Read: times |
#118119 - Well, it's not PL/M 51, for sure Responding to: ???'s previous message |
It's PL/M-386.
It mentions its differences from various other PL/Ms, but not PL/M-51 :-( Also doesn't answer my sideline question about the history of PL/M... |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| PLM 51 Manual | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I'll have to do the "easter egg hunt" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No joy ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| How long ago? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| This any good? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Well, it's not PL/M 51, for sure | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| about 15 years ago? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
PLM 51 manual | 01/01/70 00:00 |