| ??? 03/07/07 13:28 Read: times |
#134465 - Why, oh why Responding to: ???'s previous message |
in http://www.8052.com/forumchat/read.phtml?id=134287 I showed that the TWO conversions (pulse to voltage and analog to digital) would NEVER get even close to the presision the OP wants and gave a SIMPLE solution that would.
Why, oh why does the discussion of the IMPRECISE method the OP suggested go on when the OP clearly want a precision at least 100 times better than this method can provide. Is thia another case of "I have decided HOW I want to do it, I do not care that you guys tell me that it will not work" Erik |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| precision duty cycle to analog signal conversion | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| WHY? and how | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 16 bits resolution | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Uncertainty | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| uncertanity | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| PWM | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| it's an AWFUL solution | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Or stick with the F352... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Is "F352" a 4-letter word... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| well, if you want to look like me ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Really? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
What sensor? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Resolution does not help you here. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Analog signal is proportional | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| you are right | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Simple answer | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| true rms convertor | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Why RMS | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| why rms | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RMS detectors suffer from high crest factors,... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Why, oh why | 01/01/70 00:00 |