| ??? 07/21/07 12:52 Read: times |
#142121 - Try an alternate form of the question. Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Hi Stefan,
Instead of asking why people once used positive grounding in cars, ask why they use negative grounding today? Is there a reason? Or, as has been asked previously, is this just one of those arbitrary not-for-any-reason choices? What are the benefits and consequences of using negative grounding? Does it impact corrosion of body parts? I really don't know if it does or not, but I also can't give you a good reason off the top of my head to choose either standard. Joe |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| another Weekend Way Off Topic | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Electrolytic effects - and further off-topic... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I faintly recalled something about electrolysis... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| And whath about older cars "plus"-ground? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| maybe the same reason... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Try an alternate form of the question. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| What's in a name? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| references | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Hanging ground straps | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Another possible use for hanging ground straps | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No contact while driving | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| ECL chips use positive grounding | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Going way - way off - off topic | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Car tyres conduct | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
ground straps | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Upside down... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| after 2 hours googling | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| It is for corrosion | 01/01/70 00:00 |