| ??? 12/03/07 20:07 Read: times |
#147815 - Google, temporarily Responding to: ???'s previous message |
I often use Google to search for threads using the "site:" keyword. Always I hit the bulls eye within the top 10 or 20 results, and if I could remember the author of the message or some part of the reply, then the hit is always perfect :-)
Richard, try this. 214 Search results, and you should be able to refine the search further! Sometime back, I had similar opinion regarding the search facility. Regards, Vignesh |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| about that SEARCH feature | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| it's the choice of the proper keywords | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| ampersand | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Maybe, but if they tried it last time ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Search facility | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| maybe it's the other way around | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Common problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| a q'n'd fix suggestion... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| How is the search string interpreted? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| a few things found out by experimenting... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| You\'re right | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| There may be more to this than meets the eye! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Use quotes to search for a phrase | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| made it a FAQ | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Google, temporarily | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| That should work ... but ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| TTL Compatibility | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
There are two separate issues | 01/01/70 00:00 |



