| ??? 02/08/08 08:00 Read: times |
#150454 - Misinterpretation Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Ap Charles said:
When bench mark after 24hrs is being set then it is ASSUMED by the manufacturing people that the 376ppmco2 level is there. No, that's not true at all - read Oliver's post again: Oliver Sedlacek said: (my emphasis)
If the CO2 level is 600 ppm for more than 24 hours, then this is not a suitable detector. One could add: If the CO2 level is 600 ppm for more than 24 hours, then this is not a suitable detector for this application. As ever, you need to review the component's specifications, and see if these match your requirements. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| F i g a r o gas sensor question | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Makes sense to me... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| it will not work as we expect ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Please read the datasheet | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| little confusion.. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Gas detection conventions | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| How can manufacturer be so confidant ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Misinterpretation | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| But the manufacturer is ASSUMING !. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Still missing the point | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Then you would get an ? .. we are talking about | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| while the above post does not make much sense .. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| That may be a mercaptan sensor :) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I know all that | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
These are already part | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Hence the warning | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I'm working on a gas .... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Flammable | 01/01/70 00:00 |