| ??? 05/23/08 14:38 Read: times |
#155067 - It could be none at all ... Responding to: ???'s previous message |
An external UART wouldn't suffer from being wedded to the MCU clock, it's true. The async channel isn't really a part of the application and could simply be omitted.
RE |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Asynchronous Serial Port handshake? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Question isn\'t quite clear | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Thie problem is exactly analogous to,,, | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Protocol? "We don't need no %$#@! protocol!" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Good Luck | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Sorry to step on your toes ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 'right now' | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| sounds to be a case for an external UART... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE sounds to be a case for an external UART... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| double post, ignore | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| It could be none at all ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Switch | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
The goal is to minimize the data loss | 01/01/70 00:00 |