| ??? 06/02/08 14:40 Read: times |
#155405 - Thanks - this is what I needed originally. Responding to: ???'s previous message |
It can be nicely seen that it's quite costly to account for noise... Still better than just dumbly repeat the codes.
JW |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| math quiz of the week | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Hamming distance. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Do you know the answer already? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I am interested in the result, of course... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Here's the table: | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Thanks - this is what I needed originally. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Much better than repeating the codes. | 01/01/70 00:00 |