| ??? 09/30/08 21:25 Read: times |
#158708 - why interpreter? Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Lynn Reed said:
We could even have an interpreter that would run 8051 code. Without attempting to guess whether this is a good idea or not at all: Why would you go for an interpreter, if you can have a true '51 cast to the silicon next to the ARM or whatever? JW |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| ARM in an 8051 footprint | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| small niche product | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Extra signal processing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Extra connectivity | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| new external hw => no need for pin-compatibility | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| why interpreter? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Nice idea | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Avoiding PICs | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| OT: harvard memory issues? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Harvard memory issues | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Oh, I see. Thanks for the clarification. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Interpreter, or macro assembler | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not "trailing edge" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
What would be the advantage? | 01/01/70 00:00 |