| ??? 10/25/08 17:31 Read: times |
#159355 - Now you know why Philips (now NXP) ... Responding to: ???'s previous message |
... insist on such a tight hold on the "I2C" name:
http://www.8052.com/forum/read.phtml?id=159128 I think you are right: there is no specific definition of SPI - it was just a feature of certain Motorola (now Freescale) chips, and was never specifically defined outside the datasheets of the chips that happened to have it. I'm sure I started a thread on this very subject some time ago, but I can't seem to find it now... |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| SPI is a free for all ?? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Danger to use block sizes not n*8 bits | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| The non-standard, standard | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Master is easy, slave is pure hell | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| control by chip select | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Correct | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Now you know why Philips (now NXP) ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Yes. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| What was the incompatibility? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Instruction length. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Bad knowledge of that EEPROM manufacturer | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Oh the irony. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No Analogue Irony At All | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I have company.. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Your T7 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Simple interpretation | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| FTDI | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I have company | 01/01/70 00:00 |