| ??? 03/27/09 09:54 Read: times |
#163895 - A Cunning Plan... Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Oliver Sedlacek said:
Do have any reason for trying to do something cunning other than engineering curiosity? I was just wondering if there were any tricks to simplify the process, and/or make it more reliable. My main concern with just "trying all the speeds in turn" was, as I said, if the modem auto-bauds and so you get stuck with an unnecessarily high or low speed. But, thinking about it, that needn't be a real problem: Once I've got comms with the modem, I can then send it the command to explicitly set it to whatever speed I like! But I think I'll still go with the idea of trying the "preferred" and "most likely" speeds first... |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Autobaud - the other end... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Doh | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Eh? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Homing in | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Considerations | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| How does it respond to AT? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| The proper response to "AT" is "OK" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| no absolutely perfect solution | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Character time | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Go for KISS | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| only be needed once after a modem change. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Some ARM7's have Autobaud detect | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No - the *other* end! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Fall back and forward | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Only interested in local DTE-DCE speed | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| You were clear | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Start slow, or start fast...? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Unnecessarily high? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| High baudrate = bursty | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Throughtput | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Keep Up? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Keeping up always hard at high baudrates | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| KISS? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| A Cunning Plan... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Timing | 01/01/70 00:00 |