| ??? 12/09/09 15:40 Read: times |
#171528 - No-touch sense Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Hi Andy,
First, I don't really have any experience with this technology, except as follows. Back in the early 1980's I worked at an alarm company. We used a module to protect safes called a "proximity detector," (a suggested search term, in an alarm/security context). The distinction between a touch sensor and a proximity sensor is that you don't need to physically touch a proximity detector. You just need to get close to whatever metal it is in contact with (in our case, a safe). That would address any problem with people wearing gloves. As I said, I've never fooled with any of this from the electronics aspect. However, I suspect it's just a Wein bridge. A body getting close enough would alter the capacitance, and a level detector would adjust the "sensitivity." I would suggest you do more searching with these terms and see what you can find. Good luck. Joe |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Touch Sense Solutions - which is best? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| not a dirct answer, but relevant | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Cypress has a line... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
SILabs too | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No-touch sense | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| State of the art/market? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| USB flash - which is the best? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| FSR | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| a discussion of the pros & cons | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| You might get some comparisions here | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Overview | 01/01/70 00:00 |



