| ??? 06/05/10 15:52 Read: times |
#176428 - not really Responding to: ???'s previous message |
When I use SiLabs' CP2102 I include their programmers' interface library. I don't decode their routines, I just "Include" them and call them like any other instruction. And they work.
Would this count? not really, a 'device driver' is hardly the same as a piece of 'reusable code'. The example you are given also is NOT 'universal' and (only somewhat, if typical code from SILabs) written for efficiency, not universality. Erik |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Gimme Code: Is it really worth it? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Yes, in intensive writing situations | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Unreasonable expectations | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Depends | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| As an exercise... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| gimme binary | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Did he? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| sometimes you'll find out what you need on the go | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Fundamental flaw | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| then "gimme binary and schematics" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| LCD code | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not the point? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Ah, I see... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| now we know | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Ha! My wife and children... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| two key words | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I wouldn't go that far | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Code Reuse | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| A possible counterpoint, or maybe a confirmation | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| not really | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| is that the reason I need a multi-GHz PC to ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| an example of really useful 'reusable' code | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Compiler libraries | 01/01/70 00:00 |