| ??? 12/30/10 17:04 Read: times  | 
#180350 - Disagree Responding to: ???'s previous message  | 
Hi Michael,
 Though my intial reaction was to agree with you, upon reflection I think I disagree instead. That's not to say I'm interested in Jeckson's offers to barter. I just think that by making it effectively part of his signature he is keeping it sufficiently discrete and innocuous that I don't object. Anyway, that's my thought on the matter. Joe Staff & Sling  | 



