| ??? 10/11/12 22:08 Read: times | #188630 - bug Responding to: ???'s previous message | 
| For anyone critiquing or using the code for their own application
 
//call this on a 1mSec or more tick that is not on an interrupt.
void TIMERS_sort_out_timers(void){
	unsigned char i;
	unsigned int elapsed_msecs;
	elapsed_msecs = timer_count;
	timer_count = 0;
	for (i = 0; i < NUMBER_OF_TIMERS; i++){				//step through each of our timers
		if (timer_array[i].current_value != 0){			//see if we have already expired.
			timer_array[i].current_value -= elapsed_msecs;			//if not then decrement the timer toward 0 or past 0 
			if (timer_array[i].current_value <= 0){		//now see if we have timed out
				timer_array[i].current_value = 0;		//make sure that we won't fire again if we are a single shot timer, we may have gone past 0 
				if (timer_array[i].timer_type == timer_periodic){	//if we run on a periodic timer 
					timer_array[i].current_value = timer_array[i].reset_value;	//reload the timer 
				}
				timer_array[i].timeout_func(timer_array[i].func_args);			//if we have timed out then perform the function in our callback.
			}
		}
	}
}
 I have made sure to explicitly set the current_value to 0, so that the fire won't repeatedly fire if the time tick causes the current_value to go negative. | 
| Topic | Author | Date | 
| Timers - Function Pointers | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Too much for a '51? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I Agree | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Function Pointers... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| you are violating KISS | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Various Timer Functions | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Thanks Michael | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| regardless, you are violating KISS | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| even on ARM | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| The timer simply increments | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| bug | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| more bugs | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| thanks   | 01/01/70 00:00 | 



