| ??? 02/28/13 09:23 Read: times |
#189507 - That seems a bit hard Responding to: ???'s previous message |
I've fiddled with impulse testing in the past but I've been put off by it. A large impulse may swamp the system (i.e. make it go non-linear) and a small impulse calls for really good resolution on the measurements, possibly below the noise floor. PRBS seems a better bet, but needs more effort then swept sine waves to establish the validity of the test setup (especially if it's your first attempt). |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Do I have to buy an expensive network analyser? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Automate it? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| frequencies below 10kHz... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| re: frequencies below 10 kHz | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| If you really need one, maybe you should rent one | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| PRBS | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Impulse response... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| That seems a bit hard | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
How about the the new Agilent scope, | 01/01/70 00:00 |