??? 09/08/05 22:15 Read: times |
#100836 - exactly! Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Maarten Brock said:
why are you suddenly comparing Keil and SDCC by their startup code if you intend to create a library? Why are you comparing footprints at all? Isn't that upto the future user? The difference in startup code is only relevant in this trivial example; in any real application, the real Keil startup code would be required. As Maarten says, your stated objective at the start of this thread was to create an SDCC library for your "customer" to use. If your customer has decided to use SDCC, why are you worrying? |
Topic | Author | Date |
Compatibility - ".LIB" files | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Library Files | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
SDCC.LIB | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
thanks, but a major hurdle to cross :o( | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
easy as pie. use "dir" to make a list o | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Easier Still | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Naah | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
hard? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
downloaded the Setup file :o) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
What's the problem? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
edit startup file for SDCC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
same question, same answer as below | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
SDCC startup | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
hex-file? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
edit startup file for SDCC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
same question, same answer as above | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
sorry for the double entires | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I can not say for sure, but another comp | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
SDCC main.c results | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
_sdcc_external_startup() | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
exactly!![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 |