| ??? 09/15/05 22:10 Read: times |
#101150 - NO Responding to: ???'s previous message |
you said it must be, like: No, I said that both are equally wrong. It's probably bible time for you, which means you must sit back and read how the uart works and esp. what sets TI exactly. I said you could remove everything about TI from the interrupt. And that you must clear TI before you start sending. And that you must wait until the byte is completely sent before sending a new one. The alternative which is a bit harder, but better approach is to do it all in the interrupt and handshake with main through different means (not TI, nor SBUF). |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Serial communication between 2 at89c52 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I had a quick look and since I am not | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| pic? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| again | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| re your ISR | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| i've modified the ISR | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| get it going with a PC at one end that g | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| i'll try 2 do that | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| transmit | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| sorry | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No, do it in the interrupt | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| must be like this? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| should be | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| thanks | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| NO | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| problems again, pls help me | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
still don't get it | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| with only two processors why are you con | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| i've said | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| then this is a bad title. | 01/01/70 00:00 |