| ??? 09/17/05 09:53 Read: times |
#101187 - With Craig on this one Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Craig Steiner said:
I don't think that it is necessarily reasonable to imply that using the large memory model is an indication of a system that hasn't been properly engineered. Or, conversely, that using the SMALL model is an indication of a system that has been properly engineered! "Properly engineered" is about using the right memory model in accordance with the project requirements. Using the LARGE memory model is effectively just saying, "All data in XDATA unless otherwise stated" - I can't see that this is any worse engineering than saying "All resistors 5% carbon film unless otherwise stated" or "All tolerances +/-0.5mm unless otherwise stated" |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| compiling in SDCC on 89c52 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Move some variables | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| all in xdata | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| go have a cup of coffee | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| If that isn't enough.. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| a disastrous approach | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Indeed | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| we agree, I hope, on both points | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Pardon me for breathing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| why the need for a pardon | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Really? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| With Craig on this one | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
the full story | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| how much | 01/01/70 00:00 |