??? 04/24/06 18:10 Read: times |
#114919 - bad? I'd say elegant Responding to: ???'s previous message |
I increase the voltage reference (and also VCC of course) to 5.12V (it's still under the 5,5V of ADC's AMR). By using 5.12V I don't have to use the table because each step of the ADC would represent an 0.02V increment
bad? I'd say elegant. However, just to "stay within the numbers" it would, maybe, just maybe, be an idea to use 2.56V instead. Now, this is only interesting if what you want as an end result is voltage If it is grams, psi, degrees or some such the "simple Vin to voltage" conversion has no value. Erik |
Topic | Author | Date |
Adc output | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Back to basics | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
binary | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Not quite! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
A bad tip that works | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
bad? I'd say elegant | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
4.096 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
It's an 8-bit converter | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I know | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
2.56![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 |